Selecting Measurement Accuracy, Resolution, and Repeatability

Daniel Price6 min read
Data AcquisitionOther ManufacturerTechnical Reference
Licensed PE Working through this on a live machine? A Maine-licensed engineer can take it from here — included with IMD hardware, by the hour for everything else. Book an engineer

A measurement becomes trustworthy only after the physical input, conversion chain, scaling, communications path, and displayed value have been checked separately. Follow the value from the measurand to the final tag; a stable number can still be inaccurate, and extra displayed digits can still exceed the system's usable resolution.

Where does the measurement value travel?

The data path starts at the physical quantity, not at the controller or display. The sensor responds to the measurand, signal conditioning converts that response, an analog-to-digital converter quantizes it, software scales the raw value, and a display, PLC tag, historian, or control loop consumes the result.

Path element Failure or limitation Check
Measurand and mechanical installation Poor contact, loading, mounting stress, or unsuitable location Confirm that the sensor experiences the quantity being evaluated.
Sensor and wiring Offset, interference, lead resistance, grounding, or damaged conductors Inspect the physical connection and compare the signal at the source and receiver.
Input conversion Range mismatch, quantization, noise, or filtering Verify the configured input type, range, filter, and raw count behavior.
Scaling Wrong engineering-unit endpoints or arithmetic Compare raw counts and scaled values at multiple known inputs.
Network address or port The client reads the wrong device, channel, or tag Trace the displayed value back to the configured source identifier.
Update timing Aliasing, stale data, or filtered transients Compare source and destination timestamps while changing the input.

A network can transport an incorrect measurement without altering it. Layer one first: prove the physical input and conversion before troubleshooting protocol routing. Check: apply a controlled input and confirm that the corresponding raw channel changes in the expected direction.

What does measurement accuracy describe?

Accuracy describes closeness to an accepted reference value. For reading x_i and reference x_ref, the signed error is e_i = x_i - x_ref. Repeated error with the same sign indicates bias in the complete measurement chain. Accuracy is not the spread of repeated readings.

Use a reference with suitable calibration status and uncertainty. The comparison includes the installed sensor, wiring, conversion, scaling, and indication unless individual components are being tested separately. A component accuracy specification cannot be assigned automatically to the assembled channel; each contributing error and the reference uncertainty must be considered.

Observation Likely meaning Next check
Readings cluster away from the reference Repeatable measurement with bias Check zero, span, scaling, installation, and calibration.
Error changes across the range Span, linearity, or range configuration problem Test multiple points rather than correcting only zero.
Reference and channel both fluctuate The test cannot isolate channel error Stabilize the input and compare synchronized readings.

Check: record the reference, indicated value, signed error, test condition, and time at each test point.

What does resolution limit?

Resolution is the smallest input change that produces a distinguishable recorded change. On a graduated instrument it can be associated with the smallest readable division. In an electronic chain, the usable resolution also depends on sensor response, converter step size, input range, noise, filtering, scaling, communications encoding, and display rounding.

Displayed decimal places are formatting, not proof of resolution. If a value is transmitted or displayed with finer increments than the source can discriminate, the extra digits contain no additional measurement information. Likewise, converter counts do not establish end-to-end resolution when input noise makes several counts unstable.

Setting Effect on the data path Pitfall
Input range Maps the physical signal into the available conversion range An unnecessarily wide range can reduce discrimination over the operating region.
Filter Reduces fast variation More filtering can make the value look stable while increasing response delay.
Display precision Changes shown digits It does not improve sensor or converter resolution.
Update interval Controls when new values become visible A slow update can hide real input changes.

Check: change the applied input in progressively smaller controlled increments and identify the smallest change that appears reliably at the final destination.

How is repeatability tested?

Repeatability describes the spread produced by repeated measurements of the same item under the same defined conditions. Hold the operator or automated method, instrument, setup, location, environment, direction of approach, and test interval constant. Changing these conditions evaluates broader reproducibility rather than repeatability alone.

A direct summary is the observed range, R = x_max - x_min. A sample standard deviation can describe the distribution when enough repeated observations are collected. Always retain the individual readings; the range depends strongly on sample count, while a single statistic can conceal drift or steps.

  1. Stabilize the physical input and reference.
  2. Approach the test point in the same direction for every trial unless hysteresis is the property under test.
  3. Record repeated readings without recalibrating between trials.
  4. Review the sequence for drift, periodic interference, discrete count changes, and outliers.
  5. Calculate the range and any required statistical measure.

Sampling and filter timing belong in the test record. Readings taken before settling measure dynamic response as well as repeatability. Check: repeat the sequence and confirm that the calculated spread remains acceptable under the same conditions.

How do accuracy, precision, and repeatability differ?

Precision describes how closely repeated results agree with one another. Repeatability is precision evaluated under tightly controlled, unchanged conditions. Accuracy instead compares results with a reference. A channel may therefore be precise but inaccurate, accurate on average but poorly repeatable, or limited by resolution before either property can be evaluated properly.

Pattern Accuracy Repeatability Diagnostic direction
Tight cluster near the reference Good Good Verify performance across the required range.
Tight cluster away from the reference Poor Good Find bias, scaling error, or calibration offset.
Wide spread centered near the reference The average may be close, but individual readings are unreliable Poor Check noise, installation, process variation, timing, and resolution.
Readings move only in coarse steps Not decided by this observation May appear artificially stable Test end-to-end resolution before judging spread.

Check: plot repeated readings against the reference so that bias, spread, drift, and quantized steps remain separate.

How is the complete measurement path commissioned?

  1. Define the measurand, engineering units, operating range, and acceptance criteria for accuracy, resolution, repeatability, and response time.
  2. Inspect the sensor installation, conductors, shielding, grounding, and input termination before changing software.
  3. Verify the input type, conversion range, scaling endpoints, filter, update timing, and displayed precision.
  4. Confirm that each network address, channel, and tag maps to the intended physical input.
  5. Apply controlled reference inputs at multiple points through the operating range and record signed error.
  6. At selected points, collect repeated readings under unchanged conditions and calculate their spread.
  7. Introduce the smallest required input change and confirm that it survives conversion, communications, and display formatting.
  8. Perform a final dynamic test from the physical input to every consuming tag, display, alarm, historian value, or control calculation.

The final record must connect each reference input to the raw value, scaled value, destination identifier, timestamp, error, and repeated-reading spread. Check: repeat the end-to-end test after saving the configuration and restarting any component whose retained settings affect the path.

FAQ

What happens if a sensor is repeatable but not accurate?

Repeated readings cluster tightly but remain offset from the reference. Check installation, zero, span, scaling, and calibration before accepting the channel.

What happens if the display shows more decimals than the input resolves?

The extra digits imply detail that the measurement chain cannot discriminate. Determine the smallest reliable end-to-end input change, then format the display to match usable resolution.

What happens if filtering improves repeatability?

The displayed spread may decrease because high-frequency variation is suppressed, but response delay increases. Verify both steady-state spread and response timing against the application criteria.

What happens if the average reading matches the reference but individual readings vary widely?

The average may show little bias while repeatability remains poor. Inspect noise, mechanical installation, process stability, sampling timing, and conversion resolution.

How do I verify accuracy, resolution, and repeatability together?

Apply traceable reference inputs at multiple points, record signed error, repeat readings under unchanged conditions, and introduce progressively smaller changes. Finish by confirming that the physical change reaches the correct final tag with the required value and timing.

Back to blog