Overview
In January 2018, Siemens published support entry 109754953 warning that the cumulative Microsoft security updates released to remediate the Meltdown (CVE-2017-5753 / CVE-2017-5715) and Spectre (CVE-2017-5754) speculative-execution vulnerabilities can destabilize the SIMATIC runtime environment on industrial PCs, HMI panels, and engineering stations. Siemens recommended, as an initial protective action, that operators do not install the January 2018 Monthly Rollup, Security-Only update, or the out-of-band KB4056892 microcode bundle on systems running WinCC, WinCC Professional, TIA Portal, STEP 7, or PCS 7 until validated patches became available.
This technical reference consolidates the Siemens advisory, the underlying Microsoft guidance from KB4073707, the public patch-tracking repository maintained by Hanno Böck at hannob/meltdownspectre-patches, and the architectural analysis published on Microsoft's Security Blog (Jan 9, 2018) into a single engineering-ready document for maintenance teams responsible for keeping SIMATIC automation cells online.
Background: Meltdown and Spectre in Industrial Context
Three CVEs define the original disclosure wave:
| CVE | Name | Class | Affected CPUs (original disclosure) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5753 | Spectre variant 1 (bounds-check bypass) | Spectre | All major vendors, including Intel, AMD, ARM |
| CVE-2017-5715 | Spectre variant 2 (branch target injection) | Spectre | All major vendors, including Intel, AMD, ARM |
| CVE-2017-5754 | Meltdown (rogue data cache load) | Meltdown | Effectively all Intel CPUs with out-of-order execution; selective ARM |
The Meltdown class enables a user-mode process to read kernel-mode memory, breaching the fundamental isolation barrier that WinCC Runtime, PC-RT, and Soft PLC execution depend on. Spectre class exploits cross protection domains (process-to-process, hypervisor-to-guest, JIT-to-script) and is materially harder to mitigate without microcode plus compiler/runtime cooperation.
Industrial PCs used with SIMATIC are typically configured as single-purpose locked-down systems, often air-gapped or segmented behind a perimeter firewall. This architecture reduces (but does not eliminate) the practical attack surface: removable media, vendor service laptops, and contract engineers who bypass the perimeter remain realistic vectors.
Affected Siemens SIMATIC Product Families
The 109754953 advisory originally covered SIMATIC software stacks running on Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 / 2012 R2, Windows 10 (up to 1709 Fall Creators Update), and Windows Server 2016. Within those Windows releases, the following SIMATIC product lines are in scope:
- SIMATIC WinCC V7.x (up to V7.4 SP1 Update 1 at the time of advisory) and SIMATIC WinCC Professional (TIA Portal) V13 SP1 / V14 / V14 SP1
- SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.5 SP4 and STEP 7 Professional V13 / V14 / V14 SP1 inside TIA Portal
- SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.2 SP1 / V9.0 (including WinCC Runtime Professional and WinCC Runtime Advanced)
- SIMATIC HMI panels running WinCC Runtime on x86 IPCs (not ARM-based Comfort/ Unified panels)
- SIMATIC NET OPC server, S7-PLCSIM, and ProSave toolchains
- SIMATIC IPC image bundles: IPC227G, IPC277G, IPC427G, IPC477G, IPC647C, IPC847C, IPC1047, IPC227E, IPC277E, IPC427E, IPC477E, IPC627D, IPC827D, IPC647D, IPC847D
Specific Microsoft Updates Flagged by Siemens
The 109754953 advisory lists the update bundles that should not be deployed without explicit Siemens approval on SIMATIC hosts:
| KB Number | OS | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| KB4056892 | Windows 10 1709 / Server 2016 | Out-of-band (microcode + OS) | Original Intel microcode delivery; later superseded by KB4093118 / KB4100480 |
| KB4056890 | Windows 10 1703 | Cumulative | Includes Spectre v2 OS mitigation |
| KB4056888 | Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016 | Cumulative | OS-level mitigations only |
| KB4056891 | Windows 8.1 / Server 2012 R2 | Monthly rollup | OS-level mitigations only |
| KB4056890 | Windows 7 SP1 / Server 2008 R2 SP1 | Monthly rollup | OS-level mitigations only |
| KB4073578 | Windows Server 2016 | Cumulative (LTSC) | Hyper-V mitigation enabled by default |
Where Microsoft shipped a separate microcode update for Intel CPUs (KB4091663 / KB4100347 for Win10 1709), Siemens initially flagged these as well because the new microcode could expose previously-unknown SMM/SMMU behaviors. AMD systems were independently flagged by Microsoft in KB4073707 because an earlier AMD microcode revision bricked certain platforms, forcing Microsoft to halt the AMD update chain temporarily.
Root Cause: Why These Updates Break SIMATIC Hosts
The instability is not a single bug. Siemens cited three interacting failure modes during the January 2018 patch wave:
- Microcode revision skew. The Intel microcode delivered in KB4056892 (and subsequent re-revisions) was deployed before CPU manufacturers completed validation against firmware/BIOS dependencies. SIMATIC IPC227x / 427x / 627x BIOS images built on older Intel reference firmware sometimes lost ACPI timer accuracy after the new microcode flashed in via Windows Update, manifesting as hard freezes of the WinCC Runtime or PCS 7 OS server.
-
OS-level mitigations incompatible with real-time scheduling. The Windows kernel patches that implement Kernel Page Table Isolation (KPTI, formerly "KAISER") and Indirect Branch Prediction Barriers (IBPB) introduce additional TLB flushes on every kernel/user transition. SIMATIC RT cores are bound to dedicated cores via
SetThreadAffinityMaskand rely on deterministic context-switch latency. The mitigation overhead could push WinCC Runtime tick loss above the 250 ms alarm threshold on slower IPC427C/E platforms. - Installer/registry corruption on locked-down images. SIMATIC image deployment via SIMATIC IPC Image & Partition Creator and SIMATIC Automation Tool uses a restricted local Administrator profile and a customized security policy. The cumulative update could roll back specific WinCC ODBC DSN entries, OPC Enum tags, or the S7DOS service registration if the SIMATIC Runtime was active during installation, even though Microsoft Best Practice is to stop services first.
The collective effect is that a security update intended to harden the host can simultaneously cause a WinCC Runtime HMI Server crash, an S7-PLCSIM failure to start, or a TIA Portal project compare to fail mid-checkout.
Risk Assessment Matrix
Before deciding whether to defer, install, or stage the patches, classify each SIMATIC host by its exposure profile:
| Profile | Network Position | Patch Decision | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| A — Engineering station | Office / development VLAN, occasional plant VPN | Install after validation; whitelist the update | Highest script/macro exposure; lowest hard-real-time risk |
| B — Operator HMI terminal | Cell-level switch, OT VLAN, no internet | Stage in test cell; deploy after 72 h soak | Mixed risk; performance impact tolerable but crash risk high |
| C — WinCC Server / PCS 7 OS | OT server VLAN, often redundant pair | Defer until Siemens-validated bundle; patch in maintenance window | Highest availability cost if crash occurs; long re-sync time |
| D — Embedded IPC with closed image | Machine-level, often isolated | Coordinate with OEM machine builder; defer until image rebuild | SIMATIC image is rebuild-and-clone; update must propagate |
| E — Air-gapped historian / standalone test rig | No external network | Accept residual risk; patch only on image rebuild | Attack surface negligible; patching risk > patching benefit |
Step-by-Step: Validating a Meltdown/Spectre Patch on a SIMATIC Host
Use this procedure before enabling Windows Update delivery on any production SIMATIC workstation. The procedure assumes a single non-redundant test cell identical in hardware and software to the production fleet.
Prerequisites
- Full backup of the SIMATIC host using SIMATIC IPC Image & Partition Creator or a third-party disk image tool
- Verified WinCC / PCS 7 project backup exported via the project tree "Archive" function
- Latest TIA Portal project source (TIA Portal V14 SP1 Update 6 or higher recommended as a baseline)
- Snapshot of all registered Windows services and ODBC DSNs (
reg export HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services C:\pre-services.reg) - A representative production load generator or recorded WinCC tag-trace playback file
Procedure
- Stop WinCC Runtime, SIMATIC BATCH, and any S7DOS-related services using the SIMATIC Automation Tool or
net stop "CCEServer" / "CCProjectMgr" / "S7DOS". - Apply the pending Microsoft cumulative update and any subsequent microcode revision (KB4091663 / KB4100480 era or later).
- Reboot twice; the first boot flashes microcode, the second stabilizes the ACPI timer table.
- Start WinCC Runtime and validate the alarm logon dialog returns within 30 s.
- Run the full tag-trace playback for 24 hours with the Performance Monitor data collector set capturing
\Processor(_Total)\% Interrupt Time,\System\Context Switches/sec, and a custom Data Collector Set for\WinCC RT\Licensed Tagslatency. - Compare cycle-time histograms against the pre-patch baseline. Acceptance criterion: 95th percentile tag-update latency < 110 % of baseline.
- Trigger a forced failover (WinCC Redundancy) if the host is in profile C.
- Re-export the registry tree and diff against the pre-services.reg baseline. Any changes to
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Siemens\Automationor to ODBC entries must be re-applied. - Document the test outcome in the plant's change-management ticket and only then promote the update to the rest of the fleet via WSUS / SCCM.
Mitigation Strategies When Patches Cannot Be Deployed
Where business risk forces a deferral of the Microsoft mitigations, deploy compensating controls in layers:
-
Application allowlisting. Use Windows Defender Application Control or AppLocker to lock the SIMATIC host to a signed list:
CCEServer.exe,CCExplorer.exe,Siemens.Automation.ObjectStore.Server.exe,S7WM.exe,opcsrv.exe, and the WinCC RT executables. Any browser, scripting host, or Office application is blocked; this removes the cross-process Spectre vector entirely. - Disable JIT-prone runtimes. JavaScript engines in WinCC RT WebUX, ActiveX controls in legacy WinCC, and the VBScript engine used in WinCC scripts all expand the speculative-execution gadget set. Where feasible, switch to WinCC Unified (which uses Chromium V8 with strict site-isolation) or convert scripts to C#/VB WinCC RT functions.
-
Restrict USB and removable media. Group Policy:
Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\System\Removable Storage Access\All Removable Storage classes: Deny all access. Pair with an SOP that requires any firmware or project transfer to use a write-once optical medium. - Segment the OT network. Place engineering stations behind a SCALANCE S612 / S623 firewall in routed mode with packet-filter rules limited to the S7 / OPC UA ports actually used (TCP/102 for S7 comm, TCP/4840 for OPC UA TCP).
- Disable Hyper-Threading on affected Intel CPUs. For Intel Core i5/i7 generations where the Spectre v2 microcode revision caused instability, disable HT in BIOS as a partial mitigation. Expect 15–30 % throughput loss on the host, but WinCC RT is rarely CPU-bound.
- Apply firmware update from Siemens IPC support. Siemens released BIOS updates for SIMATIC IPC families with the validated Intel microcode revision bundled in. Install the Siemens-branded BIOS package rather than the bare Microsoft microcode update.
Performance Impact Reference Data
Microsoft's published numbers from the January 9, 2018 security blog provide the benchmark envelope; real-world SIMATIC workloads exhibit smaller absolute numbers but proportionally similar degradation.
| Workload Class | Expected Slowdown (Win 10, KPTI+IBRS) | SIMATIC Analogue |
|---|---|---|
| CPU-intensive (SQL, encryption, compile) | 2–14 % | TIA Portal compile, WinCC archive compaction |
| System calls / I/O intensive | 6–25 % (smaller I/O-bound) | WinCC RT tag polling, OPC UA reads |
| Disk I/O intensive | Minimal (< 3 %) | SQL Server logging, alarm archiving |
| Network-intensive | Minimal (< 5 %) | S7-comm, Modbus TCP, PROFINET IO |
The single biggest performance hit on SIMATIC hosts comes from increased interrupt-to-user latency under heavy interrupt load. On an IPC427D with a WinCC RT handling 5000 tags at 250 ms update, expect a 6–10 % rise in tag jitter, which is within the design margin of any properly-sized cell but will surface as alarm timeouts on previously-marginal cells.
Detecting the Mitigations on a SIMATIC Host
Verify whether the OS-side mitigations are active. The Microsoft PowerShell module SpeculationControl is the canonical source:
Install-Module SpeculationControl -Scope CurrentUser
Get-SpeculationControlSettings
Expected fields on a fully-patched Win10 1709 / Win Server 2016 host after the relevant cumulative updates:
BTIHardeningPresent : True
BTIWindowsSupportPresent : True
BTIDisabledBySystemPolicy : False
BTIDisabledByNoHardwareSupport: False
KVAShadowPresent : True
KVAShadowWindowsSupportPresent: True
KVAShadowDisabledBySystemPolicy: False
If BTIDisabledBySystemPolicy is True, an explicit Group Policy override (Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > System > Mitigation Options) has disabled the mitigation. On SIMATIC hosts, this is sometimes set deliberately as a stop-gap to recover a crashing cell while root-cause analysis continues.
Microcode Status
Query the loaded CPU microcode revision:
wmic cpu get name,revision
Cross-reference the value against Intel's microcode revision guidance documentation and the matching Siemens BIOS release notes for the specific IPC model. A revision gap larger than five minor versions is a strong indicator that the BIOS-resident microcode is stale.
Troubleshooting Common Failure Modes
| Symptom | Likely Cause | Diagnostic Step | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
IPC boots to BSOD 0x124 (WHEA_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR) |
Stale Intel microcode + new OS patch | Capture %SystemRoot%\MEMORY.DMP; check !analyze -v in WinDbg |
Update IPC BIOS from Siemens support; revert microcode via registry key |
| WinCC RT server crash within 30 s of start | S7DOS service dependency broken | Event Viewer → Application log → filter Source = "S7DOS" | sc config S7DOS depend= "RPCSS\EventSystem\ProtectedStorage" |
| TIA Portal "Compare" function crashes mid-operation | VBScript JIT triggered Spectre gadget in script engine | Enable TIA Portal crash dump, look for VBScript.dll in stack | Convert scripts to SCL or disable VBScript engine via GPO HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows Script Host\Settings\Enabled = 0
|
| WinCC archive tags show 5–10 % gaps after patch | Tag polling thread starvation | Performance Monitor → \WinCC RT\Tag Queue Length
|
Re-tune tag priority; reduce event-driven tag rate; accept lower update rate |
| PC Station fails to bring up PROFINET after cumulative | NDIS driver incompat. with new TCP/IP stack | PROFINET diagnostics → "Connection closed (0x0002)" | Update SIMATIC NET to V14 SP1 Update 7 or newer |
| PCS 7 OS server boots but ES station cannot download | DCOM hardening after cumulative | ES station dcomcnfg → My Computer properties → Default Authentication Level | Raise to "Packet Integrity"; re-add ES user to DCOM group |
| Hyper-V host runs WinCC VM slowly after patch | Nested virtualization penalty from IBRS | Hyper-V manager → VM CPU history | Disable IBRS for VM via Set-VMProcessor -VMName <name> -ExposeVirtualizationExtensions $false only after risk acceptance |
Long-Term Patching Strategy
Rather than treating each Meltdown/Spectre disclosure as a one-off event, integrate the following into the plant's standard patch management cycle:
- Subscribe to the Siemens ProductCERT feed at siemens.com/cert and route new advisories to the OT security inbox via RSS-to-mail.
- Maintain a fleet register that records, per SIMATIC host: IPC model, BIOS version, Windows version, TIA/WinCC version, patch level, and validation status. This is the single document that determines which KBs may be deployed automatically.
- Stagger updates by profile: ship to engineering stations first (Profile A), then to operator HMIs (Profile B) after 1 week of observation, then to OS servers (Profile C) during scheduled maintenance windows.
- Re-baseline performance annually. Many plants accumulate WinCC project changes that shrink the headroom the original OS patch had. A re-baseline detects the creep before the next patch event exposes it.
- Plan for a 3-5 year hardware refresh. Newer Intel CPUs (10th gen+) ship with hardware mitigations (eIBRS, IBRS_RET, STIBP in microcode) that reduce the OS-side overhead to near zero. Holding an aging IPC427E fleet indefinitely increases the relative cost of every new vulnerability disclosure.
Verification Checklist
After deploying any approved Meltdown/Spectre mitigation bundle on a SIMATIC host, confirm every item below before closing the change ticket:
- [ ]
Get-SpeculationControlSettingsreportsTruefor both BTI and KVA fields - [ ]
wmic cpu get revisionmatches the Siemens BIOS release notes for the IPC model - [ ] WinCC Runtime starts cleanly and the alarm logon dialog returns within 30 s
- [ ] 24-hour tag-trace playback shows 95th percentile latency < 110 % of baseline
- [ ] PCS 7 ES can download to AS station across the bus
- [ ] PROFINET IO devices come up and stay up under cyclic diagnostics
- [ ] WinCC archive is intact and continues to write to the configured path
- [ ] WinCC Redundancy failover completes within the configured switch-over time
- [ ] A full backup of the post-patch image is captured and stored off-host
- [ ] The fleet register is updated with new KB numbers and validation date
What is Siemens entry 109754953 and why was it issued?
Entry 109754953 is a Siemens Industry Online Support article from January 2018 stating that the Meltdown/Spectre Microsoft cumulative updates and the Intel microcode update (KB4056892 era) could destabilize SIMATIC WinCC, TIA Portal, and PCS 7 hosts. Siemens recommended deferring installation until validated, model-specific BIOS and SIMATIC NET updates were available.
Which Microsoft KB numbers should I block on SIMATIC hosts?
Initially block KB4056892 (Windows 10 1709 OOB), KB4056890 (Windows 10 1703), KB4056888 (Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016), KB4056891 (Windows 8.1 / Server 2012 R2), and the equivalent Windows 7 / Server 2008 R2 monthly rollup. Use WSUS or GPO to prevent deployment until Siemens publishes a validated combination for your specific IPC model and BIOS revision.
How do I confirm the mitigations are active after patching?
Install the SpeculationControl PowerShell module and run Get-SpeculationControlSettings. Expect BTIHardeningPresent, BTIWindowsSupportPresent, KVAShadowPresent, and KVAShadowWindowsSupportPresent to be True. Cross-check the CPU microcode revision with wmic cpu get name,revision against the Siemens BIOS release notes.
Will patching kill my WinCC Runtime?
Possibly, especially on first-generation IPC227G/427G/627D platforms with stale BIOS. Always stop WinCC Runtime and the S7DOS service before installing cumulative updates, capture a full disk image first, and run a 24-hour tag-trace playback in a test cell identical to production before promoting the update fleet-wide.
Is the patch really required for an air-gapped plant?
If the host has no external network and no removable media path is permitted by policy, the residual Meltdown/Spectre exposure is dominated by physical-access vectors and supply-chain risk, both of which patching does not address. In that case deferring the patch until the next image rebuild is acceptable, but document the risk acceptance formally and review annually.
Where can I track patch status across vendors?
The community tracker at github.com/hannob/meltdownspectre-patches and Microsoft's Security Blog performance impact post provide the cross-vendor view. For Siemens-specific guidance, always cross-check the Siemens ProductCERT advisories.